-
Comparing different enamel pretreatment options for resin-infiltration of natural non-cavitated carious lesions.
- Volver
Metadatos
Autor personal (a)
Abdelaziz, M; Rizzini, AL; Bortolotto, Tissiana; Rocca, GT; Feilzer, AJ; Garcia-Godoy, F; Krejci, I.
Título
Comparing different enamel pretreatment options for resin-infiltration of natural non-cavitated carious lesions.
Resumen
PURPOSE: To compare two different enamel pretreatments and their effect on the efficiency of penetration of a one-component adhesive into natural carious lesions. METHODS: Eight extracted human molars and premolars with non-cavitated interproximal lesions were selected. ICDAS code 1-2 was assessed by visual, microscopic, X-ray and Diagnocam record analysis. Samples were cut vertically across the demineralization to obtain two symmetrical lesions, (n=16). After isolating the cut surfaces with nail varnish, paired lesion halves' surfaces were pretreated with two different techniques: Group 1: surfaces were firstly abraded with fine diamond-coated metallic strips (Steelcarbo) and then etched with 37percent H3PO4 acid (Omni-etch, 120 seconds); Group 2: lesion surfaces were etched with 15percent HCl acid (Icon-etch, 120 seconds). All teeth were stained with rhodamine isothiocyanate (RITC) solution (12 hours) and subsequently stored in dry chamber (3 hours). All samples were penetrated with a one-component adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) for 180 seconds and coated with a thin layer of flowable composite (Tetric Flow). After light curing, un- encapsulated dye was bleached by immersion in 30percent hydogen peroxide for 12 hours at 37ºC. Remaining lesion pores were stained with sodium fluorescein solution. Thin cuts of the teeth were observed with confocal microscopy and computer image analysis was performed (ImageJ). The percentage of penetration (area of resin penetration/area of total demineralization x100) was calculated. RESULTS: Pretreatment with fine aluminum oxide-coated metallic strip followed by 37percent H3PO4 acid showed a larger infiltration area (51.7percent ñ 12.2) in almost all samples compared to pretreatment with 15percent HCl acid alone (22.1percent ñ 13.2). Statistical analysis using t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.011).(AU)
Descriptores DECS
GRABADO ACIDO DENTAL^sMétodos; ABRASION DENTAL POR AIRE^sMétodos; RESINAS COMPUESTAS^sQuímica; RECUBRIMIENTO DENTAL ADHESIVO; ESMALTE DENTAL^sUltraestructura; MATERIALES DENTALES^sQuímica; DESMINERALIZACION DENTAL^sPatología; CEMENTOS DE RESINA^sQuímica; ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO
Localización del documento
Biblioteca FO
Base de datos
OBRA
Nivel de tratamiento
as
Pag (a)
44442
Título seriada
American Journal of Dentistry
Volumen (nivel serie)
29
Número de la seriada
1
Editorial
Moshe & Linder
Fecha de Publicación
2016
Ciudad de publicación
Weston
País de publicación
US
Tipo de documento
Artículo original
Tipo de material
Artículo original